Talk:Cub Central
From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
How is "pedophilic" NPOV when it's an accurate description of the contents? Seems a bit of an attempt at white-washing. 733 19:00, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm Theoria, one of the writers whose work is published via CubCentral, and I'd like to clarify the above point. The site is not classed as Pedophilia in any sense, since the characters featured in the artwork and stories are animals, not children. Zoophilia would be more accurate and not NPOV, since Zoophilia is a sexual attraction to animals. Thanks :) Theoria E. Volution 15:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- This is a recurrent issue; is it zoophilia because animals are involved, or pedophilia because they are - in many cases - clearly intended to be both "people" and younger than adult? Or is it both? Probably not a question to be decided here, though. --GreenReaper(talk) 16:35, 7 April 2010 (UTC)