Talk:Boston and Shaun

The next page link for page 20 of this comic is broken - it goes to the front page. --GreenReaper^(talk) 18:58, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Criticism

Boston and Shaun has been the focus of many debacles in the past, including being featured as Something Awful's "Awful Link of the Day." The comic itself has been criticized due to an excessive lack of plot and character development. The grammar seen in the comic has also come under attack as poorly constructed and weak at best. Lastly, the humor of the comic has been questioned due to the fact that the comic often times attempts to carry a serious plot and be humorous at the same time, failing in both respects. (from user 66.140.87.202)

Alternatively, we could probably work that text into the article if there were at least some references. --Douglas Muth 18:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

"(Moved heavily loaded POV "==Criticism==" section to the discussion page. Wikifur is not a review site, and a entry is not a forum for personal opinions. Please use talk page for those matters)"

Ok, next time I will go ahead and cite my "Heavily loaded POV" with dozens of articles claiming that Boston and Shaun is the un-funny sack of crap it really is. --66.140.87.202

The problem with Something Awful is the fact that it is a bias site. Most of the information there isn't good and that's saying a lot. I think the new Boston and Shaun is a lot better then it has been in the past. Cute too. I heard he's been using Microsoft Word to check grammer errors and it looks like it's working.