WikiFur

From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
Revision as of 11:41, 28 February 2008 by Perneseblue (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
WikiFur

WikiFur is a website dedicated to the collection and preservation of information about the furry community and culture. It is built by contributions from readers - anyone can edit the site, and their changes are reflected immediately. Over 8,000 articles have been started as of September 2007, and active translation/localization efforts exist in Czech and German.

For more information about how WikiFur works, see WikiFur:About

Mission and content

WikiFur's stated mission is to "record information of use to the furry community", in an attempt to distribute it to others. This mission has been widely interpreted, and WikiFur contains articles on art, literature and other forms of culture both created by and of interest to members of the furry fandom, as well as the people and characters within it, their history and interests, the worlds they inhabit, and much more besides. It can also offer a good introduction to the fandom, although Wikipedia's article is considered by WikiFur's founder to remain the best single page on the topic.

Motives for contributors vary. There are those who simply enjoy collecting and organizing information on anthropomorphic topics. Many are fans of particular topics and wish to help write "the definitive article" on it. Some see WikiFur as a means of "getting the truth out" about contentious subjects like the Babyfur community, while others value it as a source of information which, while not completely without bias, is at least subject to an element of peer review and modification.

Audience and impact

WikiFur did not spring up overnight, but it only took three weeks for it to be featured on Something Awful. It was selected by Wikia as Featured Wikicity in December 2005.[1]. As of September 2006, WikiFur receives 2000 to 2500 visitors and 15,000 to 20,000 pageviews per day (Google Analytics figures). Around 4000 edits are made per month, with around 75 contributors making five or more edits, and eight or nine contributors making 100 or more edits (Wikia figures). Roughly ten articles are created a day, excluding articles that are later deleted.

WikiFur's actual impact is harder to judge. Certainly, it has been referenced by others, both within and without the fandom, including Animal Passions, an article on Anthrocon 2006 published in the Pittsburgh City Paper. Some have mentioned that WikiFur was the source of information leading them to attend a convention. It has been linked to by several popular sites, including Crush! Yiff! Destroy!, Fur Affinity, PeterCat's Furry Infopages, Rabbit Valley, Yiffstar and Califur's website. The site has an international reputation, with links from Dutchfurs, FranFurence, Furbase.de and Furry.it, as well as a partner agreement with TurriWiki and visitors and contributors from every continent.

Promotional activities and advertising

WikiFur has engaged in various methods of promotion and advertising, the latter being paid for by site supporters. Promotion usually focusses on two goals: increasing readership, and attracting new editors. Emphasis is often made of WikiFur's size, both in terms of articles and audience, and of the importance of its mission. Methods of promotion have included conbadge-like business cards, flyers, ribbons, and posts and comments on news sites, forum and LiveJournals, along with paid conbook advertising and Google AdWords coverage.

Controversy

As a popular fandom site with avenues of discussion, WikiFur has its share of controversy.

Concern over mission and misuse

A few people worry that WikiFur provides a perfect source of information for trolls, furry-bashers, and others who delight in pointing out certain aspects of the fandom. WikiFur does contain information that confuse or disgust some people, and it has been linked to by websites that seek to highlight such information to promote stereotypes of the fandom, though so far the effect has not been particularly significant.

There is also concern that WikiFur may be co-opted by such people to push their point of view in the name of neutrality - this was highlighted when an Encyclopedia Dramatica user was found to be editing the same articles on WikiFur and on ED at the same time.[2]

Removal of information

As of September 2006, roughly one article in three on WikiFur is about a person. Contributors are encouraged to make articles about themselves and other members of the furry fandom, as well as those who do not consider themselves members but who are related in some way. This sometimes leads to problems, especially when it turns out that the people concerned do not want information about them at WikiFur, and has led to the development of a personal information policy that is under continued review.

One of WikiFur's objectives is to do no harm to past or present members of the fandom. Some contributors and non-contributors feel strongly that people have a "moral right to privacy", and this has compelled removal of factually correct information from articles in some cases. At the same time, there are those who consider it to have a moral duty duty to other members of the fandom to preserve history, especially when they believe there is an unstated reason to remove it. Balancing the two views is not always easy, and has led to heated discussion and criticism of WikiFur from both sides - the former calling it a "stalker's heaven" while the latter accusing it of compromising its mission or "playing favorites" (as there are no absolute rules about what information may be removed).

Several people have proposed a legal right to privacy, but so far have failed to come up with any relevant laws when challenged to do so. The use of legal threats has not helped the case of those requesting a removal.

Exclusion of a person from WikiFur (as authorized by the consensus of the community) is typically implemented through locking the page about them with a short message. It is also possible to for administrators to implement a limited editing system, such that only administrators and the person concerned may edit an article.

Examples

  • Non-notable artists and other fans are usually removed on request without comment, although some have been convinced to watch the page or to turn the page into a personally-controllable page
  • Notable people, including some "famous" artists, entertainers and members of the fandom who have caused controversy are opened to debate, and in some cases certain information is moved to relevant pages before exclusion is applied
  • Extremely notable people are unlikely to receive full exclusion of the page about them, though some particularly decidedly personal information may be removed
  • A person's real name and location is usually allowed to be removed without question, although there are cases in which even this has not been granted even after debate (the prime example of this is Sibe)
  • Removal of a person's name from an article that is not specifically about them is generally only permitted if their identity is not important - for example, the name of a person who bought a painting for $10,000 at auction was not considered important since the issue was the price of the painting
  • Articles about comics and other public works are not subject for removal even if the author requests it, as they are not "personal information" - some artists have contended that their work is "not furry", but as they are on WikiFur because they are of interest to furry fans, this is not considered a valid reason either

Bias

There is an ever-present danger of bias on WikiFur. The most notable bias is due to the fact that most editors (and all of the most dedicated members) are members of the furry fandom, and the majority are likely to have a positive opinion of it. This can lead to accusations that articles are biased towards the furry fandom's position - and sometimes these accusations are accurate.

There is also little to stop people adding overly-positive information about things they like, or overly-negative (sometimes even downright malicious) information about things they do not like. Such information may or may not be removed by others when it is added; either way, it can cause controversy. Arguments are typically solved by removal of unsourced information, the provision of references, or (in the case of opinion) specific attribution of statements. Sometimes it is suggested that the relative proportions of content that is present in an article may itself put the topic in a false light - the usual answer to this is to suggest that the person complaining about it fix it by adding other relevant information.

Some people believe WikiFur can never be a reliable source of information. Despite this, WikiFur is perceived by some to be a more reliable source than others on contentious topics that it covers[3], and it has been praised for its attempts to provide useful information while avoiding bias.[4][5]

Vandalism

Like many furry forums and sites which allow comments, WikiFur has its share of vandals. However, since it is a simple matter to return to a previous state, most vandalism is reverted within minutes. The members of 4chan's /b/ board took particular interest in the site, and regularly organized raids until August 2006.

Despite multiple attempts, no vandalism since Something Awful from any source has succeeded in disrupting WikiFur for more than a few hours - the worst case was a sophisticated account-registering bot that used the Tor proxy system, which has since been blocked.

Timeline

It should come as no surprise, but in case you were wondering: "yes". Yes, there is a Wiki for furries. Don't spam it up, if only out of respect for the wikipedia ideal.

As a result, a mass of users hit the WikiFur servers. At the peak one edit was made every 45 seconds.

At first we thought it was just an extension of the previous trolling, but as I tried to record the IPs and figure out some sort of pattern, I saw they were all over the place. Our next thought was proxies, but even then, there were just too many edits. Finally a vandal posted the URL while making an edit, and so we found out exactly what happened. Then we got chosen as Awful Link of the Day . . .
I drafted several sysops from those trying to revert the edits, and we slowly beat back the tide. By about 14:00 EDT we had a reasonable handle on things, although edits were still coming thick and fast. Ironically, it probably helped us far more than it hurt, considering how many users it brought into the site, but it was hectic at the time! --GreenReaper(talk)

Interesting facts

Quotes about WikiFur

  • WikiFur? Furry has to take everything and make a down-syndrome version of it. -- Chuckles on HLM
  • Furries have the worst case of Manifest Destiny ever. -- Spiral Cut Mink
  • Someone recently told me about the WikiFur Central project. It's a wikicity on furryism, basically. It's pretty crappy and a perversion of what Wikipedia is supposed to be about, but that's not really my point. -- J of God Hates Furries
  • Thank you very much, Wiki moderators. As to my drinking, this is indefensible, and you have my abject apologies. I find of late that I have very little choice in the matter of expressing emotions. When I browse WikiFur I can either drink, or I can weep. And drinking is so much more subtle. -- McGroarty in a shout on HLM MUCK
  • Special:Allpages has its pages ranked into sections for listing. They should make the results a slogan. "Wikifur: From 2 to Zoophilia." Eh? EH? :) -- Crassus
  • I first cringed at the thought of a furry wikipedia roaming on the net. I figured it to be a rather one-sided "don't talk about the bad, only use it as a propaganda site to make furries look good" website. What I found it to be instead was a rather well done unbiased encyclopedia on the fandom.[4] -- nothingkat
  • Please do not take offence, but this site featured article scares me. It is a person dressed in an animal costume sitting on a couch. -- Makon, on the WikiFur nomination for Featured Wikicity
  • I had no idea that furry culture was this big! Wow, this is really a nice community. :3 -- The LP
  • Wikifur is definitely one of the fix-stars on the furry sky ;) -- Toumal
  • It's a field crowded with high-quality entries, but WikiFur's emergence and growth after a smear campaign makes it uniquely qualified to receive attention, methinks.[1] -- Tom Howling voting for WikiFur as a Featured Wikicity
  • Somewhere else in this thread somebody posted a link to the furry wiki. As of so far, this is the only even handed thing I have seen posted here regarding Starfinder as it reports the allegations, doesn't claim them as truth and provides information on what to do. How hard is that?[3] -- Darkwolven comparing WikiFur to artists_beware
  • WikiFur was definitely useful, I would have spent months gathering information without it. Feh on that! I was also glad to see that it seemed to maintain a rather evenhanded point of view overall; considering how factionalized FF can be that can be difficult. One man's fair is another man's controversy...[5] -- Chris F. Grant

Related terms

  • The term 'Wikifur' (sometimes inter-capped as WikiFur, also Wikifurry/WikiFurry) is also used to describe a frequent contributor of WikiFur, much like 'Wikipedian' is used to describe a frequent contributor of Wikipedia
  • A WikiFur page about a person is sometimes (incorrectly) referred to as "a wiki" or "my wiki", in the same way that people refer to "my LiveJournal" or "my MySpace"; this usage is not endorsed by regular editors

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Wikia features WikiFur as Featured Wikicity, December 2006
  2. ↑ Accusation of dubious editing practices by GreenReaper against SleepAtWork
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Comment about WikiFur in regards to Starfinder by Darkwolven in artists_beware, 9 August 2006
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Praise for WikiFur's attempts at avoiding bias by nothingkat
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Comment on the use of WikiFur by Chris F. Grant
  6. ↑ From the Star Wars talk page:
    Maybe we can try to vote for Wookieepedia to make it the next month's featured Wikicity? w:Featured Wikicity/vote Sikon [Talk] 18:15, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
    • Almost there... Just a few more votes to beat WikiFur, pleease! - Sikon [Talk] 15:20, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
      • If you only knew the power of the furry side . . . why not join us, and we can rule together as WookieFur! --GreenReaper 09:40, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)
        • Nnnnoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!! --Azizlight 09:41, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)
        • We...we actually lost? To furries?! God help us. *echos Azizlight* --MarcK [talk] 05:48, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

See also

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikifur.com/w/index.php?title=WikiFur&oldid=184765"