Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arcturus"

From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Corrected section)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
::Is it? I agree with TheListener, just because it's a furry wiki we should still try to maintain consistency like any other serious wiki. -Andreus 19:38, 17 July 2006
 
::Is it? I agree with TheListener, just because it's a furry wiki we should still try to maintain consistency like any other serious wiki. -Andreus 19:38, 17 July 2006
 +
 +
Ermm... what "outright untruths" is Fur Affinity spreading? I'd like to know what exact lies myself and others of my website are being accused of in this Wiki article.
 +
--[[User:Preyfar|Preyfar]] 12:50, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
  
 
==Verix Section==
 
==Verix Section==
Line 17: Line 20:
  
 
::Thanks, rewriting the rest now. -[[User:Nidonocu|Nidonocu]] - [[User talk:Nidonocu|talk]] [[Image:Trans 168.png|16px|Nidonocu]] 06:44, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 
::Thanks, rewriting the rest now. -[[User:Nidonocu|Nidonocu]] - [[User talk:Nidonocu|talk]] [[Image:Trans 168.png|16px|Nidonocu]] 06:44, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 
Ermm... what "outright untruths" is Fur Affinity spreading? I'd like to know what exact lies myself and others of my website are being accused of in this Wiki article.
 
--[[User:Preyfar|Preyfar]] 12:50, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 08:50, 5 August 2006

In short, Arc is cool.

Flynn-- 22:46, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

I'm not an expert on style here, but wouldn't it be better to say "Arcturus is the person responsible for..." instead of "Arcturus is the dragon responsible for..." in my opinion, it reads better and is less confusing to readers.

--TheListener 17:21, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)

We are a furry wikipedia, so I think its perfectly ok to refer to people by species. -Nidonocu 13:40, 17 Aug 2005 (UTC)
Is it? I agree with TheListener, just because it's a furry wiki we should still try to maintain consistency like any other serious wiki. -Andreus 19:38, 17 July 2006

Ermm... what "outright untruths" is Fur Affinity spreading? I'd like to know what exact lies myself and others of my website are being accused of in this Wiki article. --Preyfar 12:50, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Verix Section

I'm wondering if this article should have the mentioned section striped from it. Yes it does state it is supposed to be funny and not true, but WikiFur is supposed to contain facts not amusing fiction. Plus it does contain some real facts that need to be represented as truth. I'd like other peoples' opinions before I rewrite this article, however I am likey to just do it anyway since I feel it needs clean up. --Nidonocu - talk Nidonocu 05:47, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I will move that section to a subpage of User:Verix, with a link, and put {{personal-article}} at the top. --GreenReaper(talk) 06:27, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Thanks, rewriting the rest now. -Nidonocu - talk Nidonocu 06:44, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)