Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zootopia"
From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
GreenReaper (Talk | contribs) (It's also not really the place of WikiFur's editors to deliver a direct opinion on whether the movie is "definitive of the furry genre". That's what reviewers are for.) |
Ya0i world (Talk | contribs) (→Interest) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:However, because it ''does'' have a Wikipedia article, ''this'' article should focus on matters specific to [[furry fandom]] in relation to the movie. There is no need to repeat content that will be available at Wikipedia, beyond the minimum provided for context. We should cover fan-art and fan projects, fan sites or [[:Category:Multiplayer worlds|multiplayer roleplaying worlds]] which relate to the movie, etc. - especially if those things are "interesting" to furries, but would not meet the conditions to be included in the Wikipedia article. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]<sup>([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])</sup> 16:47, 19 February 2016 (EST) | :However, because it ''does'' have a Wikipedia article, ''this'' article should focus on matters specific to [[furry fandom]] in relation to the movie. There is no need to repeat content that will be available at Wikipedia, beyond the minimum provided for context. We should cover fan-art and fan projects, fan sites or [[:Category:Multiplayer worlds|multiplayer roleplaying worlds]] which relate to the movie, etc. - especially if those things are "interesting" to furries, but would not meet the conditions to be included in the Wikipedia article. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]<sup>([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])</sup> 16:47, 19 February 2016 (EST) | ||
:It's also not ''really'' the place of WikiFur's editors to deliver a direct opinion on whether the movie is "definitive of the furry genre" or something along those lines. That's the job of third-party reviewers like [[Fred Patten]] who give their considered opinions on news and feature sites such as ''[[Flayrah]]'', which we might then quote and reference here. Such recognition can come ''after'' the movie is released. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]<sup>([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])</sup> 16:52, 19 February 2016 (EST) | :It's also not ''really'' the place of WikiFur's editors to deliver a direct opinion on whether the movie is "definitive of the furry genre" or something along those lines. That's the job of third-party reviewers like [[Fred Patten]] who give their considered opinions on news and feature sites such as ''[[Flayrah]]'', which we might then quote and reference here. Such recognition can come ''after'' the movie is released. --[[User:GreenReaper|GreenReaper]]<sup>([[User talk:GreenReaper|talk]])</sup> 16:52, 19 February 2016 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Oki, I'm just want to play too fast x3 I should think sometimes... So all that's derivated from the movie and belong to the furry genre, but not the film itself for the moment! --Ya0i world | ||
Revision as of 18:03, 19 February 2016
Interest
Found an article here expressing that the film could, somehow, be a big deal for the fandom. My question is: is it that important? Doesn't the film deserve to be recognized as a furry genre film? For myself, I find it could be a great reference, an approach of the fandom that also draw the distinction between furry and funny animals (cf. Chicken Little). Want to know what you think ;-) --Ya0i world
- Well, sure, that's why we have an article on it. If it weren't important to furry we'd just change links to direct readers to Wikipedia:Zootopia. :-)
- However, because it does have a Wikipedia article, this article should focus on matters specific to furry fandom in relation to the movie. There is no need to repeat content that will be available at Wikipedia, beyond the minimum provided for context. We should cover fan-art and fan projects, fan sites or multiplayer roleplaying worlds which relate to the movie, etc. - especially if those things are "interesting" to furries, but would not meet the conditions to be included in the Wikipedia article. --GreenReaper(talk) 16:47, 19 February 2016 (EST)
- It's also not really the place of WikiFur's editors to deliver a direct opinion on whether the movie is "definitive of the furry genre" or something along those lines. That's the job of third-party reviewers like Fred Patten who give their considered opinions on news and feature sites such as Flayrah, which we might then quote and reference here. Such recognition can come after the movie is released. --GreenReaper(talk) 16:52, 19 February 2016 (EST)
- Oki, I'm just want to play too fast x3 I should think sometimes... So all that's derivated from the movie and belong to the furry genre, but not the film itself for the moment! --Ya0i world