Difference between revisions of "The Geek Hierarchy"
From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
m (Reverted edits by 76.106.240.72 (talk) to last version by Sine) |
(weasel words) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Sjöberg ranked [[furries]] high in geekiness in his chart and correspondingly close to the bottom of the pile of those looked down upon; however, the absolute epitome of geekiness, as determined by the Geek Hierarchy, is "People Who Write Erotic Versions of [[Star Trek]] Where All the Characters Are Furries, Like Kirk is an [[Ocelot]] or Something, and They Put a Furry Version of Themselves as the Star of the Story." <nowiki>[sic]</nowiki> | Sjöberg ranked [[furries]] high in geekiness in his chart and correspondingly close to the bottom of the pile of those looked down upon; however, the absolute epitome of geekiness, as determined by the Geek Hierarchy, is "People Who Write Erotic Versions of [[Star Trek]] Where All the Characters Are Furries, Like Kirk is an [[Ocelot]] or Something, and They Put a Furry Version of Themselves as the Star of the Story." <nowiki>[sic]</nowiki> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
Revision as of 22:50, 2 January 2010
The Geek Hierarchy was devised by Lore Sjöberg and published on his now-defunct humor website, The Brunching Shuttlecocks, in January, 2002. The hierarchy was a complicated chart that shows what groups consider themselves 'less geeky than' other groups.
Sjöberg ranked furries high in geekiness in his chart and correspondingly close to the bottom of the pile of those looked down upon; however, the absolute epitome of geekiness, as determined by the Geek Hierarchy, is "People Who Write Erotic Versions of Star Trek Where All the Characters Are Furries, Like Kirk is an Ocelot or Something, and They Put a Furry Version of Themselves as the Star of the Story." [sic]