Difference between revisions of "Talk:Smokin' Aces"
From WikiFur, the furry encyclopedia.
(→Furry relevant?) |
(→Furry relevant?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
As it stands right know, unless it can be expanded upon, it seems to be a very weak reason for inclusion. On personal viewing of film, the first thought was "costume attire from [[Wikipedia:Circus Circus Las Vegas|Las Vegas' Circus Circus]] hotel, not precisely "somebody's fursuit used for sex,"... The [[The Drew Carey Show|Drew Carey Show]] suit episode did indeed allude to the notion, even if it didn't mention [[furry]]. Thoughts? [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 15:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | As it stands right know, unless it can be expanded upon, it seems to be a very weak reason for inclusion. On personal viewing of film, the first thought was "costume attire from [[Wikipedia:Circus Circus Las Vegas|Las Vegas' Circus Circus]] hotel, not precisely "somebody's fursuit used for sex,"... The [[The Drew Carey Show|Drew Carey Show]] suit episode did indeed allude to the notion, even if it didn't mention [[furry]]. Thoughts? [[User:Spirou|Spirou]] 15:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
*I think you have to include the entire scene for itself and what it is... the lawyer is obviously an archtype of a lonely pervert who has weird fetishes and as to show how weird they are he has a fursuit. While the head is primarly shown you can see the other fursuit parts during the scene and a portion of the fursuit in that screenshot by itself.<br>-'''[[Image:Skunklogo.gif]]<small>([[User:Skunk|U]])([[User_talk:Skunk|T]])([[Special:Contributions/Skunk|C]])'''</small> 15:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC) | *I think you have to include the entire scene for itself and what it is... the lawyer is obviously an archtype of a lonely pervert who has weird fetishes and as to show how weird they are he has a fursuit. While the head is primarly shown you can see the other fursuit parts during the scene and a portion of the fursuit in that screenshot by itself.<br>-'''[[Image:Skunklogo.gif]]<small>([[User:Skunk|U]])([[User_talk:Skunk|T]])([[Special:Contributions/Skunk|C]])'''</small> 15:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | *Also, [[The Shining]] has an article. So kiss it. :P<br>-'''[[Image:Skunklogo.gif]]<small>([[User:Skunk|U]])([[User_talk:Skunk|T]])([[Special:Contributions/Skunk|C]])'''</small> 15:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:52, 16 April 2007
Furry relevant?
As it stands right know, unless it can be expanded upon, it seems to be a very weak reason for inclusion. On personal viewing of film, the first thought was "costume attire from Las Vegas' Circus Circus hotel, not precisely "somebody's fursuit used for sex,"... The Drew Carey Show suit episode did indeed allude to the notion, even if it didn't mention furry. Thoughts? Spirou 15:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- I think you have to include the entire scene for itself and what it is... the lawyer is obviously an archtype of a lonely pervert who has weird fetishes and as to show how weird they are he has a fursuit. While the head is primarly shown you can see the other fursuit parts during the scene and a portion of the fursuit in that screenshot by itself.
-
(U)(T)(C) 15:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Also, The Shining has an article. So kiss it. :P
-(U)(T)(C) 15:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
